Supreme Court Sides With AT&T on Arbitration Clauses

Humberto Saabedra

The US Supreme Court has rendered a decision in favor of AT&T on the usage of contractually enforced third-party arbitration for settling disputes with customers, greatly reducing the power of class action lawsuits by forcing individuals to fight disputes on an individual basis as spelled out in the service agreement. The 5-4 decision was entered via party lines, with Justice Scalia stating that using class action suits to settle customer arbitration issues do more harm by violating existing federal statutes that favor arbitration.

The Supreme Court decision reverses two previous lower court decisions filed in the state of California that sided with consumers on the usage of class action suits to settle disputes with the carrier, as California has its own set of statutes regarding consumer protection and litigation and are considered some of the most pro-consumer statutes in the country.

Written by

Journalist since 2006, initially covering the retail wireless sector before pivoting to anime and manga trade reporting in 2008. Founder and publisher of AnimeNews.biz (2008–2017), followed by a 13-year tenure at Crunchyroll News (2011–2024) and launching K-Comics Beat with Comics Beat in 2024. Now stripping away consumer noise to build independent, data-backed intelligence desks focused on cross-border licensing telemetry, production committee balance sheets, and industrial supply-chain forensics.

Recent Posts